Foot Print
I don't get it,if it is Zodiac's print, Would there be more ?In pictures I've seen it seems their would be more.
View ArticleRe: Foot Print
morf via zodiackillersite.com brought up the subject of shoe size and the discrepancy with the measurement. It has been widely stated that Zodiac wore a 10.5, but the measurements clearly show just...
View ArticleRe: Foot Print
Tahoe27 wrote:What's up with that? The tape measure is closer to the camera than the print, something along those lines.
View ArticleRe: Foot Print
It is actually written out in what looks like a DOJ report (?) 13". Even larger than what it looks like in the picture. That would be HUGE. Odd. Although, it wouldn't be the first error I have seen...
View ArticleRe: Foot Print
This odd finding has caused me to look into shoes & shoe sizes more than I ever hoped I would. We did a little half ass poll on my site, and found people of all different heights having different...
View ArticleRe: Foot Print
Just a little project I did using my 14" Skecher shoe. The print is not as easy to see as the wingwalker track, but with the ruler next to it in a similar fashion to the Wingwalker pic, you can see...
View ArticleRe: Foot Print
My size 10 1/2 boot measures 11 + inches, nearly 12. Your foot measurement has nothing to do with this, as the print is of a shoe, not a bare foot.
View ArticleRe: Foot Print
The shadow under the ruler indicates it is closer to the camera than the footprint in the dirt. That definitely matters.
View ArticleRe: Foot Print
mj wrote:My size 10 1/2 boot measures 11 + inches, nearly 12. Your foot measurement has nothing to do with this, as the print is of a shoe, not a bare foot.My size 14" shoe leaves a shoe print of just...
View ArticleRe: Foot Print
TomVoigt wrote:The shadow under the ruler indicates it is closer to the camera than the footprint in the dirt. That definitely matters.My ruler in my pic, is not sitting flush to the ground, it's...
View ArticleRe: Foot Print
morf13 wrote:Pics aside, how do you explain the measurement of 13" length as noted in the report??I can't explain it other than to say sometimes mistakes are made in reports. However, if Zodiac's...
View ArticleRe: Foot Print
The report said approximately 13", and if the person writing the report had access to the picture of the print he's got some explaining to do.
View ArticleRe: Foot Print
Based on the last pic I posted clearly showing the width is near 5", I think it's likely the track was also 13" in length as reported in the Report. Here's a 2nd mention of it from another page
View ArticleRe: Foot Print
The shoes- not boots I have on now measure as to sole length 11.5". They are 9.5" shoes. A size 10-10.5 shoe again, not a boot goes to around 13." I can go to a 10.5" with comfort. And if I wanted a...
View ArticleRe: Foot Print
GS wrote Z had 10.5 size 'boots. Some good sites have stated the same thing. They probably got it from this report. In one "Supplementary report" NPD report when the Officer who took the sole...
View ArticleRe: Foot Print
Weather can play a big part in it too. From leaving virtually nothing to sinking to your knee. What was the weather like in the days prior to the attack?
View ArticleRe: Foot Print
In anti detection books even going back to the 60's one of the things that was suggested that if one wanted to throw off LE was to wear a much larger shoe or boot with double or very thick socks.Then...
View Article